MSc Seminar KF2, KF4, 2019 Spring
Details
Location: F 3213 (2nd floor, lecture hall 13)
Time: Fridays, 12:15-14:00.
First meeting: Feb 8, Friday, 12:15-14:00.
Language: English
Seminar leader: Andras Palyi
Rules
- Each student will present a 20-minute talk based on his/her
MSc thesis topic.
- The talk should be as comprehensible as possible to your
fellow students.
- Prepare slides in pdf.
- You should give a practice talk on the Wednesday before
your talk, or earlier.
On Wednesdays, I'm available between 8:00-12:00 and
between 14:00-16:00.
Contact me the week before the talk to find a time
for your practice talk, either in person, or via
email at palyi at mail dot bme dot hu.
- The practice talk should take 20 minutes, and it is
followed by a discussion that takes at most 30 minutes.
- In the seminar session,
use your own computer for the talk, but also bring
along the slides on a pendrive, just in case your
computer does not work with the projector.
- Test if the projector works with your computer before
the session starts.
- Be prepared to take questions.
- Each talk is followed by 15-minute discussion, during which
the audience has to write a summary of the talk in 5-10 sentences
in a google survey.
This is done in pairs.
Please do bring your laptop even if you're not the speaker,
to make sure that you can complete this task.
-
I send the summaries as a single pdf file
to the speaker. He/She will decide
if it should be published in some way.
I'm glad to publish the summaries here, if the speaker wishes so.
-
You should email me the final version of the slides right after your
talk.
- You can miss at most 3 classes.
- The grade will be determined based on the quality of the
presentation. Not giving a practice talk, or cancelling a
talk, can result in a lower grade.
Schedule
Week | Date | Speakers |
1. | 2019.02.08. |
kick-off meeting (slides in pdf) |
2. | 2019.02.15. |
Kolarovszki Zoltán (slides, summaries),
Frank György (slides, summaries)
|
3. | 2019.02.22. |
Tamás Gábor (slides, summaries),
Borsi Márton (slides, summaries)
|
4. | 2019.03.01. |
Gyulai László (slides, summaries), Csóka József (slides, summaries) |
5. | 2019.03.08. |
Szabó Zsolt
(slides, summaries),
Grabarits András
(slides,
summaries) |
6. | 2019.03.29. |
Pataki Dávid
(slides,
summaries),
Pongó Tivadar
(slides,
summaries)
|
7. | 2018.04.05. |
Szentpéteri Bálint
(slides,
summaries),
Szegleti András
(slides,
summaries)
|
8. | 2018.04.12. |
Pristyák Levente
(slides,
summaries),
Vörös Dániel
(slides),
|
9. | 2018.04.26. |
Budai Ákos
(slides),
Földvári Dominic
(slides,
summaries),
|
10. | 2018.05.03. |
Györgypál Zsolt
(slides,
summaries),
Horváth Anna
(slides,
summaries),
Sütő Máté
(slides)
|
11. | 2018.05.10. |
Sulyok Bendegúz
(slides),
Szilágyi Zsombor
(slides,
summaries),
Szilvási Réka
(slides,
summaries)
|
12. | 2018.05.17. |
Sári Péter,
Szász-Schagrin Dávid,
Beatriz De Simoni
|
Guidelines
- Many researchers post on the web their advice on how to make
good talks.
An example from a theoretical physicist
is here (section 6).
Another principle that is worth considering
is
this one from a mathematician.
Probably it doesn't make sense to blindly follow any of such advice,
but it does make sense to read those and consider applying
the suggestions.
-
When you present the results of a research activity, it might make the presentation more comprehensible if you clearly separate various types of information. One way to do this is to follow this scheme:
- Describe the physical setup.
- Describe which physical quantities are treated as control parameters.
- Describe which physical quantities are measured or calculated.
- Pose a question that is addressed in your work.
- Show the result: the graph of the experimental data, or the graph of the numerical or analytical results, or the formula obtained.
- List the main features of the results.
- If possible, explain in simple terms, the “physical origin” of each feature.
- If possible, describe the consequences drawn from the results.
|